Revive extinct creatures: big debate?

Scientists and conservationists are debating de-extinction, the idea of bringing extinct species back using modern genetic tools. Advances such as PCR, genome sequencing and gene editing have made it technically plausible to reconstruct genomes from preserved DNA. Companies like Colossal Biosciences aim to use these methods to create proxy woolly mammoths by editing Asiatic elephant DNA. Proponents argue such projects could help restore lost ecological functions and biodiversity.

Critics warn de-extinction raises ethical, ecological and practical concerns. Reintroducing engineered animals could harm existing habitats or spread disease, and resurrected species may not behave like their originals. Conservationists also worry that focusing on high-profile revivals could divert resources from protecting endangered species today. Still, some scientists suggest targeted rewilding—reintroducing keystone species like beavers or wolves—combined with genetic approaches might help rebuild ecosystems if done cautiously and with strong regulation.

Who did it? And what's their angle?

Every conspiracy theory pins one culprit and one motive on the same story. The same story can spawn any number of theories — different culprits, different motives. That's part of how you spot a conspiracy theory: the same event can be "explained" any number of ways.

You'll walk through the four moves on separate screens, with a debunk on every step.